Impossible Planets
Discover Magazine, September, 1997
Read the Article "Impossible Planets" in the September,
1997 issue of Discover Magazine (page 78), then answer
the following questions:
- Some scientists claim that they have discovered planets
orbiting other stars, but, as the article explains, they did not
actually see these planets. What was the actual observation
that these scientists made that led them to the conclusion
that other solar systems exist?
- Why does the existence of other solar systems, such as 51
Pegasi, upset the current scientific ideas of how our solar system
formed?
- All scientists don't agree with the conclusion that other
solar systems exist. The article discusses at least two other
possible interpretations of these observations. What are they, and
why do some scientists propose them?
- The term "theory" is very commonly
misused, and it is misused in this article. How? The ideas about
how solar systems form discussed in this article should actually
be called what?
- What do the scientists in the article say that they need in
order to decide between different hypotheses
of how planets form?
last update August 24, 1997 by JL Stanbrough (jerry_stanbrough@bhs.batesville.k12.in.us)